RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a measure of the change in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to a vasoactive challenge. It is a useful indicator of the brain's vascular health. PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors that influence successful and unsuccessful CVR examinations using precise arterial and end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 control during blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Patients that underwent a CVR between October 2005 and May 2021 were studied (total of 1162 CVR examinations). The mean (±SD) age was 46.1 (±18.8) years, and 352 patients (43%) were female. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; T1-weighted images, T2*-weighed two-dimensional gradient-echo sequence with standard echo-planar readout. ASSESSMENT: Measurements were obtained following precise hypercapnic stimuli using BOLD MRI as a surrogate of CBF. Successful CVR examinations were defined as those where: 1) patients were able to complete CVR testing, and 2) a clinically useful CVR map was generated. Unsuccessful examinations were defined as those where patients were not able to complete the CVR examination or the CVR maps were judged to be unreliable due to, for example, excessive head motion, and poor PET CO2 targeting. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Successful and unsuccessful CVR examinations between hypercapnic stimuli, and between different patterns of stimulus were compared with Chi-Square tests. Interobserver variability was determined by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (P < 0.05 is significant). RESULTS: In total 1115 CVR tests in 662 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate of generating CVR maps was 90.8% (1012 of 1115). Among the different hypercapnic stimuli, those containing a step plus a ramp protocol was the most successful (95.18%). Among the unsuccessful examinations (9.23%), most were patient related (89.3%), the most common of which was difficulty breathing. DATA CONCLUSION: CO2 -BOLD MRI CVR studies are well tolerated with a high success rate. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Much money and energy has been spent on the study of the molecular biology of malignant brain tumours. However, little attention has been paid to the wishes of patients afflicted with these incurable tumours, and how this might influence treatment considerations. METHODS: We interviewed 29 individuals - 7 patients dying of a malignant brain tumor and 22 loved ones. One-on-one interviews were conducted according to a pre-designed interview guide. A combination of open-ended questions, as well as clinical scenarios was presented to participants in order to understand what is meaningful and valuable to them when determining treatment options and management approaches. The results were analyzed, coded, and interpreted using qualitative analytic techniques in order to arrive at several common overarching themes. RESULTS: Seven major themes were identified. In general, respondents were united in viewing brain cancer as unique amongst malignancies, due in large part to the premium placed on mental competence and cognitive functioning. Importantly, participants found their experiences, however difficult, led to the discovery of inner strength and resilience. Responses were usually framed within an interpersonal context, and participants were generally grateful for the opportunity to speak about their experiences. Attitudes towards religion, spirituality, and euthanasia were also probed. CONCLUSION: Several important themes underlie the experiences of brain cancer patients and their caregivers. It is important to consider these when managing these patients and to respect not only their autonomy but also the complex interpersonal toll that a malignant diagnosis can have.
